EEA payment and EMI institutions after Brexit

Published:
January 3, 2025
EEA payment and EMI institutions after Brexit

For the payment and e-money service providers within the European Economic Area that are covered by the FCA’s remit as an outcome of Brexit, the last several months have been a sharp turn in terms of expectations. This is due to the proposed changes to the Approach Document setting out the regulators’ approach to the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and the E-Money Regulations 2011.

Prehistory

The Tempοrary Permissions Regime (TPR) was developed to guarantee continuity of servicing for UK clients. It allows companies to transit from the passportization regime to the UK’s complete regulative regime so they can, on a temporal basis, deliver services to UK clients while they are looking for authorization. Companies now have a maximal term of 3 years to go on running business. By the end of this period, all TPR firms are obliged to notify the FCA of their plans for their business. If they intend to get authorized in the UK, it will necessitate the establishment of a UK headquarters or, if an EMI, an office.

Timeframes set by the FCA

Despite the FCA has not published guidance on a website for companies, many organizations in the TPR have received e-mails with details on the next steps. The FCA is granting companies a certain period to provide their applications and soon will be communicating with them to obtain an application form by a specified date. If a company’s authorization or registration is not accepted or its temporary authorization rejected, it will be included in one of two categories subject to how it is passported into the United Kingdom:

  • Supervised runoff – institutions in the EEA with UK offices or permissions in the UK, and firms who came into the TPR but then did not obtain UK authorization, or
  • Contractual runoff – for all other crossborder services firms.

This is the monetary services contracts framework that permits organizations to carry out an exit from the local UK marketplace.

So what are the amendments?

The main changes refer to most chapters of the Approach Document. They are as follows:

  • Safeguarding – The company must protect funds in line with UK regulations and the FCA’s rules. The FCA may ask for confirmation of the steps undertaken by firms to make sure client funds are protected in the case of insolvency. Also, there must be an engaged independent consultant to carry out a yearly audit.
  • Notifying – Companies are required to inform the regulator of changes to ownership, executive management, and outsourcing negotiations. Other aspects to be informed about include regulatory actions or adverse judgments undertaken in the homecountry of the company.
  • Reporting – It is necessary to provide information to the FCA via the Gabriel/RegData system. It refers to fraud and operational risk aspects.
  • AML obligations – Companies must adhere to UK financial crime regulations. EEA organizations with an office in the UK will already have to follow this rule, but crossborder firms, who in the past followed the obligations of their homecountry requirements will need to figure out how the UK legal system differs and adapt its procedures.
  • Client complaints – In a similar fashion, EEA crossborder firms will need to adapt their procedures to stay compliant with UK laws.

The bottom line

As a financial company under the TPR, it’s crucial to clearly know your duties as an FCA-regulated organization and adapt systems and internal documents accordingly. If a service provider wishes to go on operating in the UK after the TPR period has expired, they must establish a physical UK presence and be authorized by the FCA. If the decision is not already made, a service provider should decide on their plans for their UK business and clientele and have a roadmap and execution plan to either go on operating or exit the UK market.

Table of contents

Related insights

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in France

With the rise in cross-border transactions and increasing complexity of mercantile disputes, businesses are increasingly turning to arbitration as a means of protecting their interests. In practice, this means that awards made in one jurisdiction must be enforced in another. France remains one of key countries for the recognition of such awards, thanks to its...

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Denmark

Denmark is known as a legal authority that highly appreciates global commerce and the prominent methods of conflict resolution (especially arbitration). Obtaining arbitration means the sides gain objectivity and more efficient litigations. The ability of an arbitral decision to be brought into effect is the single most important factor determining its effectiveness. In this article,...

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Norway

The use of private dispute resolution mechanisms like arbitration has been on the rise among businesses that are globally operating. However, the real effectiveness of the decisions made through this method is measured by whether or not they can be enforced in another country. Norway is known for providing a reliable and very foreseeable set...

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Turkey

Arbitration is now one of the most popular ways of resolving business conflicts in global trade and investment. However, the significance of an award lies in its ability to be enforced and produce effects in another nation where the parties may have their assets or business interests. Turkey is one of the major players that...

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Portugal

Portugal has set up a formal system for the recognition of arbitral awards which are made abroad. It builds upon well-established multinational treaties and domestic legislation aimed at facilitating the process. The system balances giving legal force to overseas awards with the preservation of core judicial rights and fair procedures. The article provides an overview...

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Finland

One of the most popular mechanisms for settling trade disputes is the usage of arbitration judicial bodies, which besides being flexible and confidential are also quite the opposite of court litigation. However, an arbitration award given in one country is not very useful practically unless it will be able to be implemented in another country...

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in UK

The United Kingdom is at the heart of resolving disputes that arise from agreements between parties residing in different countries. For instance, if participants agree to have their cases heard and decided by a neutral judicial body, the award therefore made internationally will usually require recognition and enforcement within the UK legal system. The mechanism...
Prev
Next

Feel free to contact us

Send your request for any info